Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1

    Man Being Prosecuted for Possesion of Manga

    ICv2 is reporting that an Iowa collector is facing up to 20 years in prison for possession of manga that he ordered from Japan. Christopher Handley, a 38-year-old Iowa manga collector who faces up to 20 years in prision for possession of manga that the government claims to be obscene. Of his collection of more than 1,200 volumes of manga seized by the government, Handley is being prosecuted for images that occur in just a handful of volumes. No photographic content is at issue in Handley's case.

    The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund has signed on as consultant to the defense. CBLDF Executive Director Charles Brownstein commented, "Handley's case is deeply troubling, because the government is prosecuting a private collector for possession of art. In the past, CBLDF has had to defend the First Amendment rights of retailers and artists, but never before have we experienced the Federal Government attempting to strip a citizen of his freedom because he owned comic books."

    Putting the case into further context, CBLDF Legal Counsel Burton Joseph said, "In the lengthy time in which I have represented CBLDF and its clients, I have never encountered a situation where criminal prosecution was brought against a private consumer for possession of material for personal use in his own home. This prosecution has profound implications in limiting the First Amendment for art and artists, and comics in particular, that are on the cutting edge of creativity. It misunderstands the nature of avant-garde art in its historical perspective and is a perversion of anti-obscenity laws."

    Full article is available here and here.
    CBLDF's info page is here
    Icurs Publishing has more on it here here

    In a follow-up article by icv2 they are reporting a partial victory in part of the defence. The parts of the PROTECT Act that forbade a trial by jury and instead substituted standards set by Congress as to what is per se or patently obscene were struck down.

    Still it is only a partial victory because the other defence motions were not upheld by the court.
    The Constitutional challenges based on the vagueness of the terms “appears to be” and “minor” were rejected.
    The court did not agree with the defense’s contention that the possession of the material by Handley in his own home was protected by the Fourth Amendment’s right to privacy.

    The three criteria that must be met in order to judge material obscene that are set forth in the Miller case are:
    • (1) would the average person find that the material appeals to the prurient interest;
    • (2) whether the material depicts, in patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law;
    • (3) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

    With the fate of the case now resting squarely on the Miller criteria, the role of the CBLDF in providing expert witnesses who can testify to the literary and artistic merits of the manga in question is crucial.

    | MangaTraders - Lackey | HentaiTraders - Staff | AnimeInfo.org - Admin |
    Scanlation: Typesetter, Editor, Scanner, Cleaner, & Connoisseur
    Warning: Due to the nature of Ariolander all posts now come with a disclaimer.

  2. #2
    Wow... I don't get it though.. I still don't see why he is being prosecuted..
    What kinda images would get a person prosecuted...??
    "I'm like the sun, I'm trying to shine on everybody"
    Spoiler!


    Spoiler!

  3. #3
    H+ xioaxioa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Location Moved
    Posts
    2,708
    Quote Originally Posted by MindWanderer View Post
    Wow... I don't get it though.. I still don't see why he is being prosecuted..
    What kinda images would get a person prosecuted...??
    Loli?

    I Love You!
    Spoiler!

  4. #4
    Happy BOOSH! ChukoLiang's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Carolina
    Posts
    678
    thats odd, he'll probably get off. They can argue its just art (1st amendment of freedom of speech (via art). Reminds me when my teacher told me how the vast majority of supreme court cases are about whether its art or pornography and all the justices do is sit down and watch this stuff to determine it.

    What is uttered from the heart alone, will win the hearts of others to your own.

  5. #5
    Asce's Loyal Minion DFX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    In Your Head
    Posts
    3,185
    Quote Originally Posted by xioaxioa View Post
    Loli?
    Probably.

    The government needs to spend their time attacking the real issues and not waste their time and our money on frivalous issues like this.

  6. #6
    proud nerd fxu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Area 69
    Posts
    559
    Quote Originally Posted by Ariolander View Post
    [*] (3) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
    Who is to say something is not artistic?

    If I want to take a shit, hen pee on it, add whip-cream and a fucking strawberry at the top and I wanna call it art, art it is.

  7. #7
    Half Man Half Amazin' Phixion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    4,722
    Hmm I don't really get it, lots of diificult words .

    Avatar and Signature by Ravona

  8. #8
    Senior Member kuroihikari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,622
    Summary, some idiot amongst the Iowa prosecutors is trying to put a man in jail for having in his 1,200 volume manga collection a few volumes containing drawings involving supposed minors and sex/sexuality. Apparently because people should get shot for thinking of having sex with children.

    What's next, stop people from watching Silence of the Lambs because cannibals deserve death?

  9. #9
    [̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅] guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    in your hearts
    Posts
    2,658
    remember how pee wee got probation for basically the same thing?

    "Pee-wee Herman" actor Paul Reubens was sentenced to three years probation on April, 2004 after pleading guilty to a misdemeanor obscenity charge involving photographs seized from his erotica collection. Prosecutors dismissed a misdemeanor charge of child pornography that had carried a maximum sentence of a year in jail and a $2,500 fine.
    so be careful of what types of manga you buy.lol

    A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

  10. #10
    [̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅] guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    in your hearts
    Posts
    2,658
    art is art. real or drawings.

    remember the one movie with nicole kidman and a little kid where the little kid is nicole's dead husband? they had a scene together in the bathtub...the kid and nicole. i dont know how they did it, but there was some legal issues.

    A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •