While I agree Boa wouldn't be towards the strongest, I wouldn't put her too far down. Her haki mediocore? She send Smoker flying and broke his jite with Kairoseki in it. She kicked a pasifista's face like it was nothing. I would rank her equal to current Luffy at least.Boa has a temperamental character which is a weakness by itself, her powers wont work on serious opponents, her haki is mediocore-weak ( Smoker didnt even get a scratch after she kicked him with haki. And I am pretty sure she put a lot of effort in that kick, since she wanted to protect her beloved fuckbody.)
While I agree his weak compared to the others, I wouldn't put him down that easily. Any other Supernova or that time would have lost to him. Anyone below a Shichibukai would have been taken down by him. He wasn't even afraid of Kuma. Lacks mobility? Don't forget that he can swap places with his Shadow anytime he wants. Wouldn't call that lacking mobility, although I do admit his more of a strength based fighter (then again, so is Oz Jr, can you blame them for relying on their size?).Moria lacks mobility, the will to strengthen his body and like boa has an unsuitable character profile+ like people mentioned before he got his ass kicked pretty often
4 Great Pirates = Marine + 7 Warlords works. I mean look at WB, it was him + his crew vs 3 Admirals + 7 Warlords, and they were even most of the time. Had they had Ace on their side, and WB not been ill, the battle might have gone in WB's favour. I'm not saying WB in prime could have taken them all on the same time. But for a man to command guys like Ace, Marco and Jaws, his strength must be something else. Even Zoro had said in the latest chapter, had Luffy not been stronger than them (him and Sanji), they would have found themselves a new captain. That's why Yonkou > Admiral > Shichibukai. Shanks weaker than Kuma? Please, Shanks at least = Dragon >>>> Kuma. No question. Look at how easily a Luffy took out a Pacifista, Shanks = Rayleigh >>> Luffy. Kuma is essentially a Pasifista with a DF ability, from what we saw during the war, he doesn't even evade attacks anymore. Indeed, people like Doflamingo and Mihawk abilities are unknown. But Kuma, Jimbei and Moria at least we should be able to make fairly accurate assumptions.The whole rest seems pretty balanced for me. Taking out fodder pirates with their ships indicates nothing. Every top tier chara can do that. Comparing anyone with shanks is invalid since we havent seen him fighting yet (correct meh if I am wrong). When claiming 4 great pirates = marine +7 warlords, people overlook that 4 great pirates not only mean 4 captains but also their crew which isnt unrelevant.(Marco, hozu etc.). As a result the assumption great pirate(for example shanks)> warlord(except boa and moria) isnt backed up by facts. Shanks even with both arms doesnt have to be stronger than for example Kuma.
True. But it does give you a huge advantage in battle. And in the NW, it's kinda like a prerequisite.Furthermore assuming haki = autowin is pretty naive (btw there isnt a proof that mihafk posses haki, ).
Sad, but most likely true. BB is going to have to surpass everyone else to become the final enemy. It is his age now afterall.....Heck I wont be even surprised if shanks ends up as fodder for Blackbeard and Mihawk dies by the hand of Shiryu.
If anyone had created a thread 1 year ago ace vs blackbeard most of u would have voted for ace.
in beforehand srry for my english skills.