I wonder why the maker of this thread used the term the mother of all debates i mean there are debates one million times better suited for that title...example is there a god, why pacifism isnt popular, and one of my pesonal bests why shouldnt the world unite to destroy the good ol U.S.A.
Mythbusters: Moon Landing
Hoax 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mefEKqzq8cg
Hoax 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfKIt...eature=related
Hoax 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOv_z...eature=related
Hoax 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCNV1...eature=related
Hoax 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dTAT...eature=related
The fine fine guys at Mythbusters prove that we landed on the moon.
in fact, here's a linknot my upload, a member of tehparadox's uploadSpoiler!
if anything, the government isn't lying and saying they've done stuff, they're covering up stuff they have done.
like POW said, there are many unxplained pictures, and the government probably knows about them, but they aren't releasing the info.
Good job Aristo-kun. No matter how many times this is debunked, 40 years later it is still being recycled.
Last edited by DFX; 07-22-2009 at 02:22 AM. Reason: Double Post
I am not perfect and I defy you to prove otherwise
Growing Old Gracefully is an Oxymoron ... Mostly Moron !
Area 51 - Aliens.
Diabetes - man made?
Go, go! Got enough debate-food for a while with that!
9-11: It happened. There. And if you want to try to argue it, just realize that a lot of people died that day, which is more important. Try telling their families that it was an inside job. I dare you.
Area 51-Aliens: Are there aliens? Absolutely. If you think that we're the only intelligent beings in this giant universe you're delusional. Have they checked us out? No. They're probably still wondering if intelligent life exists themselves, no matter how advanced they are.
Diabetes-Man Made: Doubtful but I don't care enough about this one to argue.
This one was classic:
"There is nothing wrong with not believing the moon landing. "
Yeah, except if you're wrong for believing circumstantial evidence when there is absolute evidence to the contrary, you're basically saying that those astronauts who risked their life getting there are big fat liars.
Why does mythbusters seem to be the ultimate athority on everything? Has everyone forgotten they're out for one thing: money. Which means good ratings, and by human nature, we like to be agreed with and be right. So it would make sense to tell viewers what they want to hear. Also, with the pressure of being behind in the Space Race, in addition to evidence against the landing, it makes more than enough sense to me. My evidence: http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html ; http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html ; http://www.facts-about.org.uk/scienc...oax-theory.htm