
Originally Posted by
LeaT
This. There is no coherence in what you are saying, that makes it very hard to follow your trail of thought. You bring up events completely unrelated to each other and then state it in such a sense that there would be a relation after all, and then you wonder why someone doesn't understand you, but instead of explaining of what you mean, you keep reiterating what you said. I am not a native speaker either, but I have immense issues following people when they tangent off into something I find illogical reasoning, as you do in your case, because I cannot really understand how people can not be logical, so to speak.
I check the forums rather often, but I don't keep every conversation topic in my head in every thread you know. That you brought it up way back still has no relevance, because the recent discussion was still about Byakuya's bankai, not about Aizen shattering some illusion in the filler arc. You bringing it up thus really bears no real relevance, and the way you stated it didn't make it more credible or make others understand what you were talking about.
If you are going to refer back to previous posts, the burden of proof is on you. I am not going to backtrack several threads just to find that one statement from you, and you could still have been clear that you were referring to something in the anime. It has been concluded over and over that the anime is non-canon, with exactly the reason that the anime can make things up which may even contradict of what has been presented in the manga.
Instead of saying it has something to do with Unohana, you could've said something like, "But in the anime there was a filler episode that went like this...". It would've made way more sense than you bringing that up along with Unohana.
Bookmarks